How did France come to look like a consolidated democracy and why the Essay

How did France come to look like a consolidated democracy and why the fifth republic has been a relatively stable period in French history - prove ExampleThis partly explains why democracies, unless the emancipation on which they are founded is violated, are assumed to be severely equipped to deal with banes to their security. This antinomy currently appears to be more pronounced as both terms of the substitute(a) lead been assuming new configurations.In terms of security, two opposing trends are at work. there is on the one hand an overall sense of irenization of modern polities internal and external order that is encapsulated in the image of the neo-Saint-Simonean consensual/warless society, and the parent neo-Hegelian view of the end of history. At the domestic level, their sociopolitical foundations are no drawn-out questioned, and conflicts over the management of the deposit are settled through electoral alternatives. At the external level, appeasement induced by nuclea r deterrence and continued with the progress of disarmament policies was enhanced by the sacrifice of the communist system, which represented enmity for the West. On the other hand, a new and more ambivalent threat pattern emerged that increases the ubiquity of order and security issues. Within societies, deepening center-periphery tensions and sociological cleavages lead to the displacement of traditionalistic civility by more frictional relationships. From without, menaces become more insidious, discontinuous, and multifocal, and less predictable and identifiable than onward the end of bipolarity, extending on the low-intensity side of the violence spectrum and assuming unconventional aspects. Concomitantly, old-fashioned institutions and instruments of violence management, doctrines, and protocols ruling their employment, and their articulations with the state appearing less suitable and effective, call for other less orthodox means based on preemption, swiftness, and secrecy, which are generally at variance with the democratic process.The concept of democracy has been evolving also. Karl Mannheim, T. H. Marshall, and more recently Edward Shils have described its logic in advanced polities. First, rights have been extended and their nature modified to encompass just about every aspect of the individuals life. Formerly limited to civic and political contents, they became economic and kindly, and finally sociological and ethnical so as to intromit security. Second, the beneficiaries of these rights, once very few, have been extended to include the farthest peripheries of the social system (even beyond, in that advocates of the so-called natural contract or deep ecology also include animals and the environment). Thus, those who until recently would not have been judged as legitimate recipients of such rights, either because they were unable to enjoy them--e.g., the child, those mentally impaired, or immigrants, or those legally deprived such as delinquen ts--are now considered full members of the polity. Democratic rights, in other words, are seen as belonging to everyone, partisans as well as adversaries of democracy. Saint-Justs famous utterance, no freedom for the enemy of freedom, would not be applicable today. Democracy has become a holistic concept, no agelong defined in a discrete manner, be it in terms of the rights composing it or in terms of its titulars.The dilemma, then, is obvious. The rightful exigency for order and