Friday, December 27, 2019
Essay on Chestnut Blight and American Chestnut Trees
Chestnut Blight and American Chestnut Trees Since the early 1900s a disease known as Chestnut Blight has infected many American Chestnut trees and causing their removal from forests. A greater look at the history of this fungus as well as the mechanisms of action will allow us to learn on how to preserve the American chestnut. At one point, the American chestnut was virtually eliminated. With the help of government acts and conservation agencies, the American chestnut is slowly growing back in population. Two methods of restoration of the chestnut include a hybridization and the use of hypovirulant strains. This issue shows a variety of interest from ecologists to those in the timber industry who cannot lumber Asian species of chestnutâ⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦Chestnut wood is highly resistant to rot and used extensively for poles, fencing and building materials. Formerly known as Endothia parasitica, Cryphonectria parasitica enters the wound, grows in and under the bark and eventually kills the cambium all the way around the twig or bush. Blight does not affect the root system, so the ones that do survive, survive as shrubs. There is, however, no significant wild production from these shrubs. Breeding projects are underway to combine the nut quality and timber. (Anagnostakis WWW). Although currently imported Chinese chestnuts are healthy producers of good nuts, they cannot replace our native chestnut because the Chinese tree is an orchard tree, while the American chestnut creates huge tracts of big timber (ACF WWW). Overall, it is important to understand how blight works to further help protect the trees against it. Blight is a Castanea Disease which has eliminated American Chestnut Trees from landscape. This disease causes cankers on the branches then moves into the trunk and thus kills the tree. Currently, there is no chemical control for this disease. Resistance to Endothia parasitica has come from a fungus which makes Asiatic chestnut trees resistant to blight (Castanea Disease WWW). Pycnidia are tiny, orange spore-cases that characterize spreading chestnut blight. This disease has killed 4 billion chestnuts. * The fungus that causes chestnut blight invadesShow MoreRelatedThe Spread Of The Blight995 Words à |à 4 Pages4 billion trees had died as a result of the pathogen. The spread of the blight continued with approximately over a million trees dying each year. Going forward to the mid-20th century, Castanea dentata is almost extinct in American forests. The blight infection has prevented the American chestnut ability to grow to its full height, and only exist as shrubs that sprout from trees that were infected with the blight. Despite being from the same species, different species of the chestnut responded differentlyRead MoreInfections of the American Chestnut Tree Essay1714 Words à |à 7 PagesCryphonectria parasitica, a filamentous, ascomycete fungus, is the causal agent of the chestnut blight5,14 which was introduced to North America from Japan circa 190412,14.The chestnut blight infects all members of the Castanea family14, and some members of the genus Quercus though C. parasitica infections are superficial14. A C. parasitica infection typically begins at a branch node or wound in the treeââ¬â¢s bark 14. Once a spore has entered the tree, hyphal growth begins14. When the fungiââ¬â¢s hyphaeRead MoreChestnut Bark Disease1164 Words à |à 5 PagesThe Chestnut blight is a fungus which is also called the chestnut bark disease. The scientific name for this is Cryphonectria Parasitica (Murril) Barr. The organism that assaults the American chestnut has the appearance of an extensive ulcer, and is regularly found on the tree trunk or other tree surface range. It enters tree wounds and splits and develops in and under the bark, executing the territory around the tree twig, extension or trunk. Yellow or orange spores (called pycnidia) radiate fromRead MoreImportant Forest Trees and Their Uses2432 Words à |à 10 PagesImportant Forest Trees And Their Uses ( Originally Published 1922 ) Of our native trees, the white pine is one of the best and most valuable. It is a tall straight tree that grows to a height of 100 to 150 feet. It produces wood that is light in weight and easy to work because it is so soft. At ,one time there were extensive pine forests in the northeastern states. Many of the trees were very large, and occasionally one may still see pine stumps that are 5 to 6 feet in diameter. White pine made fineRead MoreThe Southwest As A Bioregion1956 Words à |à 8 PagesNortheastern territory of the United States they would have been stepping on to ground that was rich in biodiversity. The Northeast was a region plentiful with ââ¬Å"great forests of American beeches, maples, birches, eastern hemlocks, and spruces from New England to northern Pennsylvania, and oaks, hickories, American chestnuts, and pines from Maryland through Ohioâ⬠(Porter Hill, n.d.). In terms of wildlife and game that would have provided food for the European settlement they woul d have had accessRead MoreEconomic Impact of Invasive Species Essay4413 Words à |à 18 PagesThis is exactly what a walk through the jungle is like for the residence and visitors of Guam. A U.S. territory, Guam is situated in the Pacific, along the ring of fire, and is a lush 212 square mile island filled with mountainous jungle, coconut trees and streams. Jungles are known for their abundance of species, insects, lizards, birds and others. This jungle, however, is nearly devoid of such species and eerily silent as a result. This remote territory was invaded by an alien species carried toRead MoreThe Appalachian Mountains Of North America2427 Words à |à 10 Pagescrew were exploring the Florida coast in 1528, they found a Native American town with a name they transliterated as Apalachen. The word ââ¬ËApalachenââ¬â¢ was also applied to an inland mountain range, and through the course of time it became applied to the entire range and its spelling was changedâ⬠(ââ¬Å"A ppalachian Mountainsâ⬠). These mountains are some of the oldest mountains on Earth. They even predate the formation of the North American continent. Scientists have measured the Appalachian Mountains to beRead More The Impact of Invasive Species on Ecosystems Essay2985 Words à |à 12 Pagesnative vegetation, drying out critical desert water sources (Devine, 1998).à If those impacts were not enough, salt cedar also promotes fire in riparian communities unaccustomed to the burning.à Salt cedars quickly resprout after fires, unlike native trees such as willows and cottonwoods.à Salt cedars, too, increase soil salinity, to the detriment of native plants.à A species like this one is capable of irreversibly altering the habitats it enters. All these factors of habitat modification may
Thursday, December 19, 2019
Banyan Tree Holdings Ltd. Analysis - 2556 Words
1. Background The result of quality effort and focused aim of the founder Mr. Ho Kwon Ping along with time and risk invested in huge amount, Banyan Tree (as of today) is a group of luxury resorts and spas spread in allover Asia and few other famous cities of the world. Based in Singapore, Banyan Tree started its journey with the focus on converting the name into a luxury brand in the mind of its target customers in the year 1994 and till today more than 900 awards and accolades (BanyanTree.com, 2014) speaks about its success story in colorful lines. As of today, Banyan Tree Holdings Ltd.; under its supervision, management and ownership have a total of 25 hotels and resorts, a total of 68 spas, 2 golf courses and more than 66 retail outlets selling its products in 23countries worldwide. The focus is customer preferring luxury-at-any-cost and accordingly the structure and pricing policy is formulated since its entry into the market. Banyan Tree Holdings Ltd.; also have corporate-owned training and development purposed academies for the employees to ensure the desired qualitative training is being provided to the employees. Less advertisement-focused, Banyan Tree does its marketing through agents to ensure the name of the brand is well introduced to its customers. 1.1 Current Situation Growth and Sustainability simultaneously without having an impact of them on the brand was the focus of Mr. K.W. Ho (Enz Farhoomand, 2008). With the aim kept in focus banyan tree grew toShow MoreRelatedElectronic Commerce And Its Impact On Individuals And Entities2542 Words à |à 11 Pagesform or means was used for that purpose.â⬠Accordingly, both Indian Contract Act, 1872 and Information Technology Act, 2000 needs to be read together to understand and provide legal validity to e-contracts. In Trimex International FZE Ltd. Dubai v. Vedanta Aluminum Ltd. recognizing the validity of electronic transaction has held that e-mails exchanges between parties regarding mutual obligations constitute a contract. b. Formation of E- Contract For ascertaining the formation of electronic contractRead MoreRisk and Return Analysis26155 Words à |à 105 Pagesmarket is fit enough to compete with the global standards. Indeed, on a few paradigms, it is ahead of the global benchmarks. The origin of the Indian securities market may be traced back to 1875, when 22 enterprising brokers under a Banyan tree established the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE). Over the last 125 years, the Indian securities market has evolved continuously to become one of the most dynamic, modern and efficient securities markets in Asia. Today, Indian markets conform to internationalRead MoreMoney Has Time Value On The Financial Investment Market Essay10566 Words à |à 43 Pagesfund, debentures, bonds, preference share, Govt. Securities, treasury bills etc. Where the individual get a fixed amount and who do not take risk are called as a risk averse. Thus this study is mainly concentrated to find out the risk and return analysis that has been associated with the banking sector of the BSE Bankex and also to know the relationship between banks return and market returns. The chosen topic is the banking sector from the emerging sector now. The training has expose me to manyRead MoreMark eting Strategy of Dabur Vatika Hair Oil and Dabur Chyawanprash15871 Words à |à 64 PagesLimited is a leading Indian consumer goods company with interests in Hair Care, Oral Care, Health Care, Skin Care, Home Care and Foods. From its humble beginnings in the bylanes of Calcutta way back in 1884 as an Ayurvedic medicines company, Dabur India Ltd has come a long way today to become a leading consumer products manufacturer in India. For the past 125 years, we have been dedicated to providing nature-based solutions for a healthy and holistic lifestyle. Through our comprehensive range of products
Wednesday, December 11, 2019
Doctrine of Trinity
Questions: Compare and contrast a non-Christian Worldview of your choice with a Christian Worldview. What is the Kingdom of God and how does it relate to the Church? Critically discuss alternative perspectives. Answers: Introduction The convention of a Holy Trinity is not just an "article of confidence" in which all the men are asked to "trust." It is not just a creed which a Church wants it is a great individuals to "acknowledge on confidence." Neither is a teaching of a Holy or pure Trinity the innovation of researchers and academicians, the consequence of scholarly theory and philosophical thinking.The regulation of a Holy Trinity emerges from man's most profound encounters with the God. It originates from a real life learning of the individuals who ,most of the time come to understand and know God in the faith. Doctrine of the Trinity In the connection of three beings father, son and God, the "nature" is the thing that one is, while a "man or lady" is who the one is. In venture with this basic puzzle of a couple of Christian religions, there's least complex one God in the three individuals: while amazing from each other within their relations of establishment, as well as, of their relationships with each other, they are expressed to be one among else, co-indistinguishable, co-unceasing and con-tremendous, as well as, "everyone is God, entire, as well as whole".[1] There are such a variety of depiction of what the God resemble which I acknowledge as valid with is a result of one's non-open perception of who God is, however because of the certainty our human brains are constrained, it is an unpredictable trouble to totally comprehend the entire part there's to know roughly a God who's the author of all appearance; bigger than the broadly boundless of which man is a small range of creation.[2] There had been times wh ile I have perplexed to myself, by what means would I be able to think something that I am not in any case positive I catch? In what capacity can God be one and God be 3 on the equivalent time? furthermore, regardless of the possibility that I did secure it, how inside the global do I give a clarification for it without making everyone accessible pushed? Notwithstanding, as everyone undoubtedly have for the most part did, acknowledge as valid with that there might be one just God, however beneath the ensuing administration, or isonomia, as it is known as, that this one handiest God has also a Son, His expression, who continued from Himself, by method for whom all matters were made, and without whom, not anything changed into made.[3] Him we trust to have been despatched by method for the father into the Virgin, and to had been conceived of her being both person and God, the Son of man and the Son of God, and to were known as by method for the call of Jesus Christ; we acknowledge as valid with Him to have endured, kicked the bucket, and been covered, reliable with the Scriptures, and, after he were raised yet again by method for the father and took lower back to paradise, to sit at the right hand of the daddy, and that he's going to come to choose the short and the dead; who dispatched likewise from paradise from the father, predictable with His own one of a kind guarantee, the Holy Ghost, the Paraclete, the sanctifies of the confidence of people who consider inside the Father, and in the Son, and inside the Holy Ghost. Christians don't concur with in several divine beings. "That there are, in any case, two Gods or two Lords, is an affirmation which at no time continues out of our mouth.[4] For there was announced to be none beside One God and One Lord. He says that the monotheism of Christianity is a hindrance for agnostics: "The Gentiles would need to sidestep from a large number of their objects of worship to the main handiest God, essentially so a distincti on is presumably phenomenally settled between the admirers of. The one God and the votaries of polytheism." With the exception of, in the event that we had been to conjure a majority of divine beings and rulers, there is a need to extinguish our lights, and there is a need to wind up less gutsy to hold up under the saint's sufferings, from which a smooth escape may all over the place lie open to us, when everyone swore by means of a majority of divine beings and rulers, as sundry apostates do, who keep up a larger number of divine beings than One. Tertullian's skill of the Trinity does now not change at all from our advanced thought, almost 2,000 years later. However the time frame "Trinity" transformed into the utilized by Christians before Tertullian's careful clarification.[5] In advert Theophilus of Antioch wrote in his second digital book to Autolycus, "In like way furthermore, three days which have been before the lights are sorts of the Trinity, of God, and His oath, and His mindfulness." The precept of the Trinity route that there's one God who without end exists as three unmistakable individuals the daddy, Son, and Holy Spirit. said in an unexpected way, God is one basically and three in man or lady. these definitions unequivocal three fundamental truths: (1) the daddy, Son, and Holy Spirit are particular men and ladies, (2) one and all is completely God, there might be best one God. the daddy, Son, and Holy Spirit are unmistakable persons. The Bible talks about the father of God, Jesus as God,as well as, the Holy or pure Spirit as God.[6] Are these only 3 novel methods for looking at God, or earnestly techniques for alluding to three interesting parts that God plays? The arrangement should be no, on the grounds that the Bible furthermore demonstrates that the father, Son, and Holy Spirit are unmistakable humans.in the sanctification of Jesus, we see the father speak-me from paradise and the Spirit plummeting from paradise as a bird as Jesus leaves th e water. The reality that the daddy, Son, and Holy Spirit are great individuals implies, in various words, that the father isn't the Son, the Son isn't the Holy Spirit, and the Holy Spirit isn't generally the daddy. Jesus is God, yet He isn't generally the father or the Holy Spirit.[7] The Holy Spirit is God, however, He isn't generally the Son or the daddy. they're particular people, no more 3 select methods for seeking God.[8]The person-hood of each individual from the Trinity implies that totally everybody has an amazing center of consideration. as needs are, they identify with each other actually the daddy sees Himself as "I" whilst He respects the Son and Holy Spirit as "You." Likewise, the Son views Himself as "I," however the Father and the Holy Spirit as "You."some different genuine mistake people have made is to imagine that the daddy has turned into the Son, who then turned into the Holy Spirit. inverse to this, the entries we have noticeable imply that God constantly tran sformed into and dependably could be 3 individuals. there was in no way, shape or form a period when one of the men and ladies of the Godhead did now not exist.while the three people of the Trinity are great, this doesn't imply that any is mediocre compared to the inverse. on the other hand, they might be all same in traits. Application The Trinity is to begin with vital because of the truth God is essential. To secure additional completely what God resemble is a way of regarding God. further, we ought to allow the way that God is triune to develop our love. We exist to love God. Furthermore, God looks for individuals to love Him "with soul and truth". [9]Therefore, we need to more often than not undertaking to develop our love of God indeed notwithstanding in our hearts. The Trinity has a decent measured utility to supplication. [10]The general example of supplication inside the Bible is to wish to the father through the Son and in the Holy Spirit. Our partnership with God ought to be more reasonable with the guide of deliberately understanding that we are in regards to a tri-private God!awareness of the brilliant position that everybody of the Trinity has in our salvation can especially serve to present us additional solace and gratefulness for God in our supplications, and also supporting us to be particular in c oordinating our petitions. Despite the fact that, while recognizing the marvelous parts that everyone has, we have to in no way, shape or form consider their parts as so separate that alternate people aren't included. as a substitute, everything that one individual is worried in, the inverse two likewise are included in, one way or whatever other. there are various delineations which have been given to help us perceive the Trinity. [11]In the meantime, as there are a few delineations that are useful, we need to comprehend that no occurrence is great. Deplorably, there are numerous delineations which aren't completely flawed, however, in errors. One case to be careful with is the one which says, "I am one individual, notwithstanding I am an understudy, child, and sibling. This clarifies how God might be both one and 3.[12] The bother with this is it mirrors a blasphemy alluded to as modalism. God isn't generally one man or lady who performs 3 phenomenal parts, as this outline appears . He's one Being in three people, now not just 3 parts. This similarity overlooks the non-open contrasts inside God and mitigates them to insignificant parts.[13] Conclusion The Trinity isn't generally thought in three divine beings. there might be the easiest one God, and we have to in no way, shape or form stray from this.This one God exists as three persons. The 3 individuals aren't every piece of God, yet are each totally God and correspondingly God. inside God's one unified being there's an unfurling into three interpersonal connections such that there are 3 people. The distinctions inside the Godhead are not contrasts of His quintessence nor are they something included onto His embodiment, in any case, they're the unfurling of God's one, unified being into three interpersonal connections such that there are three real folks.God is not one person who took 3 successive parts. that is the sin of modalism. the daddy did now not develop as the Son after which the Holy Spirit. Or maybe, there have continually been and constantly can be three unmistakable persons in the Godhead.The Trinity isn't generally an inconsistency because of the actuality God isn' t generally three inside the equivalent way that he is one. God is one basically, three in the man or a lady. Bibliography Ables, Travis E. "The Decline And Fall Of The West? Debates About The Trinity In Contemporary Christian Theology". Religion Compass 6, no. 3 (2012): 163-173. Bergin, Helen Frances. "Trinity And Religious Pluralism: The Doctrine Of The Trinity In Christian Theology Of Religions". Mission Studies 24, no. 2 (2007): 361-362. BruÃÅ'Ãâ mmer, Vincent. Atonement, Christology And The Trinity. Aldershot, England: Ashgate, 2005. Chow, A. "Book Review: Trinity And Revelation For The Pluralistic World: Veli-Matti Karkkainen, Trinity And Revelation: A Constructive Christian Theology For The Pluralistic World". The Expository Times 126, no. 10 (2015): 510-510. Croxall, T.H. "The Christian Doctrine Of Hope, And The Rierkegaardian Doctrine Of 'The Moment'". The Expository Times 56, no. 11 (1945): 292-295. Gorringe, T. "Book Reviews : Trinity And Non-Christian Religions". The Expository Times 112, no. 10 (2001): 353-355. Heim, S. Mark. "Trinity And Religious Pluralism: The Doctrine Of The Trinity In Christian Theology Of Religions - By Veli-Matti Krkkinen". Religious Studies Review 33, no. 1 (2007): 46-46. Higton, Mike. "Scriptural Reasoning And The Discipline Of Christian Doctrine". Modern Theology 29, no. 4 (2013): 120-137. Jung, Ken Alan. "Trinity And Religious Pluralism: The Doctrine Of The Trinity In Christian Theology Of Religions. By Veli-Matti Krkkinen". The Heythrop Journal 52, no. 5 (2011): 838-839. Miller, Daniel. "The Doctrine Of The Trinity And Christian Environmental Action". New Blackfriars 94, no. 1049 (2012): 20-31. Mintoff, Joe. "On The Quantitative Doctrine Of The Mean". The Southern Journal of Philosophy 51, no. 4 (2013): 445-464. Rahner, Karl and J. F Donceel. The Trinity. London: Burns Oates, 2001. Schumacher, Lydia. "The Trinity And Christian Life: A Broadly Thomistic Account Of Participation". New Blackfriars 96, no. 1066 (2015): 645-657. "Trinity And Religious Pluralism: The Doctrine Of The Trinity In Christian Theology Of Religions". Int J Systematic Theology 8, no. 1 (2006): 112-115.
Tuesday, December 3, 2019
Play in as much detail as possible Essay Example
Play in as much detail as possible Essay People experience a huge range of emotions in their lifetime, in Romeo and Juliet; Shakespeare shows his audience a wide range of emotions through his characters, the following events and the action of the play.The audience sees characters playing several emotions and can understand how and why the characters are feeling these emotions.Indeed, by the end of Romeo and Juliet the audience would feel quite emotionally drained by what they had just seen on stage.Anger is portrayed as a very powerful emotion in this play; it is one of the reasons that the two families Montagues and the Capulets cant make the peace. I think that the two young groups are angrier than there parents in the first part of the play e.g. what! Dawn and talk of peace? I hate the word as I hate hell, all Montagues and thee this is said by Tybalt in act I scene1, a Capulet to one of the Montagues at the gas station where the Montagues plead peace. Tybalt is angry because he thinks that because his uncle is in a feu d with his rival he has to start a fight with the enemy to impress his uncle. This is a god example because it starts the story in anger, which makes Romeo and Juliets love in the middle of all the negative emotions seem lost and hopeless.You dont see much anger in the parents until the end of the play e.g. out you green sickness carrion! Out you baggage! You tallow face. This is said by lord Capulet in act 3 scenes 5 when he is in a rage with Juliet because she wont marry Paris because she is still in love with Romeo even though he killed her cousin and has been exiled. I think that her father may be angry with her because she still loves him and not only is he the enemy he killed his nephew. Her father actually hits her and starts shaking her quite roughly, he also strikes her mother when she tries to pull him off Juliet. Juliet is left to the comfort of the nurse who looks after her.Grief is not shown until Tybalt is killed e.g. my wife is dead tonight! Grief of my sons exile ha th stoppd her breath. What further woe conspires against my age? this is said to the prince in act 5 scene 3. I think that this could be that he is trying to appeal to the princes nature to let Romeo back into the city because it is causing others grief. This shows that he does care about his son because through out the play Romeo and his parent dont appear have much of a relationship.Also lady Capulet appeal to the prince for justice against Romeo, I beg for justice, which thou, prince must give. Romeo slew Tybalt: Romeo must not live. She doesnt seem to care that Tybalt killed Mercutio when Romeo was trying to convince Tybalt that he meant peace. She seems to have a more serious relationship with Tybalt than everyone thinks so maybe she grieved more than most because he meant more to her.Hatred is the strongest emotion in this play; it is clearly seen that the feud between the Capulet and the Montagues is truly hatred and that their children grew up with that so they know no diffe rent. Tybalt see Romeo at his party and sees everybody laughing at him because he would let it pass, instead he speaks to his uncle uncle, this is a Montague, our foe, a villain that is hither come in spite, to scorn at our solemnity this night I think that Tybalt enraged that they come to spite his family and the name he honours. Indeed his uncle does not want a scene at his party he has prepared, he tells Tybalt to leave it; he hits Tybalt to get though to him that he doesnt want a scene at his party. It could be that he has grown tired of this violent feud and has matured although he does seem a violent man though out the whole play.Mercutio hates the Capulets although he has no family ties with the Capulets or the Montagues. Something in the way he acts around Romeo makes me think the he values the friendship more than Romeo does. O calm dishonourable, vile submission Tybalt you rat catcher, will you walk? This is said it Tybalt from Mercutio in act1 scene2.This is when Tybalt f irst approaches Romeo at the beach with the intent of killing him of at least do him harm, instead he finds that Romeo is not there so he starts on Mercutio. Mercutio taunts him making him angrier and angrier. When Romeo turns up he pleads peace with Tybalt but he is all in a rage and you can clearly see that he truly hates Romeo and as he tries to harm him, Mercutio steps in the way therefore harming him. It is after this that Romeo hates Tybalt for what he has done and acts rashly and retaliates with dire consequences.Love is the main theme of this play for it is what the story is based on, the love that is forbidden. I think that it is cruel to deny their childrens love for the sake of a feud and the love seems lost in the middle of all the ill feelings of the rivals.It is not only the love between Romeo and Juliet but of friends and family.If thou bent on love honourable, they purpose marriage, send me word tomorrow where and what time thou wilt perform the rite. Juliet to Romeo says this in act 1 scene 2.I think that when she and Romeo have declared their love for each other, all thats left for them to do is marry, because they know that if anyone found out before they were wed they would never see each other again.Juliets mother, Lady Capulet says to Juliet about the marriage proposal from Paris the valiant Paris seeks you for his love. It seems that her parents cant see how wrongly suited for her Paris is, and how in love with Romeo she is later in the play.Her father tries to force her into marrying Paris, because he wants her to have a good life and he thinks that his choice of husbands is the right choice and nobody should question that.Juliet shows how true her love for Romeo is when she fakes her death in order to get out of her marriage to Paris.Although fear is present in this story it seems that both sides of this feud are fearless to some point. When the fight is in action it seems that both sides show no fear. I think that the only fear shown is when the friar fears that Romeo does not know the plan and thinks that his love is really dead. Also when Juliet fears that her family will deny her love e.g. bondage is hoarse, and may not speak aloud with repetition of my Romeos name this is said when Juliet fears that her family will harm Romeo for loving Juliet in act 2 scene 2.Indeed she is scared of what her father might do but at the same deeply in love with Romeo to worry too much about what she is doing.As I said the friar that gave Juliet the poison is fearful because he knows that Romeo does not know that it is poison and not death. He rushes to sends word in another letter but alas he is too late.Despair means complete lack of hope and I think that quite often Juliet feels that there is no hope for her and Romeo e.g.My only love sprung from my only hate! Too early seen unknown and known too late! Prodigious birth of love to me, that I must love a loathed enemy. Juliet says this in act 1 scene 5. In some ways she is q uite right in this because his father is her fathers rival so in turn she must hate him to. But she loves him and this is why she despairs.O Romeo, Romeo where fore art thou Romeo? Deny thy father and refuse thy name; or, if thou wilt not, be sworn my love, and Ill no longer be a Capulet. This is said Romeo by Juliet act 2 scene 2. This is sort of love and despair in the case that she is despairing because she loves Romeo but he is forbidden, and love because she loves him so much that she would refuse her name and take his which would mean abandon her own family.I think that passion differs very much from love in a way that it is almost lust e.g. o trespass sweetly urgd! Give me my sin again This is said by Romeo to Juliet in act 1 scene 5. This is when she kisses him and he is asking for more, but it is a sin because she is not wed to him and she is supposed to be pure for her husband.I think that it is not only love that tells the story but passion too.This was thought of Romeos first love, for he thinks that he is in love with rosaline who should be married to him, organised by her father, even though he has never met or seen her. Show me a mistress that is passing fair: what doth beauty serve but as a note thou canst not teach me to forgetThis is said to Benvolio, Romeos cousin by Romeo about rosaline in act 1 scene 1.Romeo is in love with the idea of love and is so rapped up in the spirit of his love that until he meets Juliet he mistakes excitement for love.Violence seems to me of more of an action rather than an emotion but it is a grate feeling in this play e.g. now by stock and honour of my kin, to strike him dead I hold it not a sinTybalt says this to all montages in act 1 scene5. I said that I thought violence more of an action than an emotion, but you can clearly see here that Tybalt is feeling violence and although he doesnt kill Mercutio until later in the play I think that he really does want to kill all montages for the sake of honour in this family feud. Also I think that Tybalt doesnt consider it a sin to kill all Montagues for he is in the right and they do not deserve the right to live in his eyes.In conclusion I feel that all the emotions contribute to this masterpiece although critics have said the story is a love and hate storyline all the other emotions bring it together.William Shakespeare has included the most intense and intimate emotions and used them to there full extent. Play in as much detail as possible Essay Example Play in as much detail as possible Essay People experience a huge range of emotions in their lifetime, in Romeo and Juliet; Shakespeare shows his audience a wide range of emotions through his characters, the following events and the action of the play.The audience sees characters playing several emotions and can understand how and why the characters are feeling these emotions.Indeed, by the end of Romeo and Juliet the audience would feel quite emotionally drained by what they had just seen on stage.Anger is portrayed as a very powerful emotion in this play; it is one of the reasons that the two families Montagues and the Capulets cant make the peace. I think that the two young groups are angrier than there parents in the first part of the play e.g. what! Dawn and talk of peace? I hate the word as I hate hell, all Montagues and thee this is said by Tybalt in act I scene1, a Capulet to one of the Montagues at the gas station where the Montagues plead peace. Tybalt is angry because he thinks that because his uncle is in a feu d with his rival he has to start a fight with the enemy to impress his uncle. This is a god example because it starts the story in anger, which makes Romeo and Juliets love in the middle of all the negative emotions seem lost and hopeless.You dont see much anger in the parents until the end of the play e.g. out you green sickness carrion! Out you baggage! You tallow face. This is said by lord Capulet in act 3 scenes 5 when he is in a rage with Juliet because she wont marry Paris because she is still in love with Romeo even though he killed her cousin and has been exiled. I think that her father may be angry with her because she still loves him and not only is he the enemy he killed his nephew. Her father actually hits her and starts shaking her quite roughly, he also strikes her mother when she tries to pull him off Juliet. Juliet is left to the comfort of the nurse who looks after her.Grief is not shown until Tybalt is killed e.g. my wife is dead tonight! Grief of my sons exile ha th stoppd her breath. What further woe conspires against my age? this is said to the prince in act 5 scene 3. I think that this could be that he is trying to appeal to the princes nature to let Romeo back into the city because it is causing others grief. This shows that he does care about his son because through out the play Romeo and his parent dont appear have much of a relationship.Also lady Capulet appeal to the prince for justice against Romeo, I beg for justice, which thou, prince must give. Romeo slew Tybalt: Romeo must not live. She doesnt seem to care that Tybalt killed Mercutio when Romeo was trying to convince Tybalt that he meant peace. She seems to have a more serious relationship with Tybalt than everyone thinks so maybe she grieved more than most because he meant more to her.Hatred is the strongest emotion in this play; it is clearly seen that the feud between the Capulet and the Montagues is truly hatred and that their children grew up with that so they know no diffe rent. Tybalt see Romeo at his party and sees everybody laughing at him because he would let it pass, instead he speaks to his uncle uncle, this is a Montague, our foe, a villain that is hither come in spite, to scorn at our solemnity this night I think that Tybalt enraged that they come to spite his family and the name he honours. Indeed his uncle does not want a scene at his party he has prepared, he tells Tybalt to leave it; he hits Tybalt to get though to him that he doesnt want a scene at his party. It could be that he has grown tired of this violent feud and has matured although he does seem a violent man though out the whole play.Mercutio hates the Capulets although he has no family ties with the Capulets or the Montagues. Something in the way he acts around Romeo makes me think the he values the friendship more than Romeo does. O calm dishonourable, vile submission Tybalt you rat catcher, will you walk? This is said it Tybalt from Mercutio in act1 scene2.This is when Tybalt f irst approaches Romeo at the beach with the intent of killing him of at least do him harm, instead he finds that Romeo is not there so he starts on Mercutio. Mercutio taunts him making him angrier and angrier. When Romeo turns up he pleads peace with Tybalt but he is all in a rage and you can clearly see that he truly hates Romeo and as he tries to harm him, Mercutio steps in the way therefore harming him. It is after this that Romeo hates Tybalt for what he has done and acts rashly and retaliates with dire consequences.Love is the main theme of this play for it is what the story is based on, the love that is forbidden. I think that it is cruel to deny their childrens love for the sake of a feud and the love seems lost in the middle of all the ill feelings of the rivals.It is not only the love between Romeo and Juliet but of friends and family.If thou bent on love honourable, they purpose marriage, send me word tomorrow where and what time thou wilt perform the rite. Juliet to Romeo says this in act 1 scene 2.I think that when she and Romeo have declared their love for each other, all thats left for them to do is marry, because they know that if anyone found out before they were wed they would never see each other again.Juliets mother, Lady Capulet says to Juliet about the marriage proposal from Paris the valiant Paris seeks you for his love. It seems that her parents cant see how wrongly suited for her Paris is, and how in love with Romeo she is later in the play.Her father tries to force her into marrying Paris, because he wants her to have a good life and he thinks that his choice of husbands is the right choice and nobody should question that.Juliet shows how true her love for Romeo is when she fakes her death in order to get out of her marriage to Paris.Although fear is present in this story it seems that both sides of this feud are fearless to some point. When the fight is in action it seems that both sides show no fear. I think that the only fear shown is when the friar fears that Romeo does not know the plan and thinks that his love is really dead. Also when Juliet fears that her family will deny her love e.g. bondage is hoarse, and may not speak aloud with repetition of my Romeos name this is said when Juliet fears that her family will harm Romeo for loving Juliet in act 2 scene 2.Indeed she is scared of what her father might do but at the same deeply in love with Romeo to worry too much about what she is doing.As I said the friar that gave Juliet the poison is fearful because he knows that Romeo does not know that it is poison and not death. He rushes to sends word in another letter but alas he is too late.Despair means complete lack of hope and I think that quite often Juliet feels that there is no hope for her and Romeo e.g.My only love sprung from my only hate! Too early seen unknown and known too late! Prodigious birth of love to me, that I must love a loathed enemy. Juliet says this in act 1 scene 5. In some ways she is q uite right in this because his father is her fathers rival so in turn she must hate him to. But she loves him and this is why she despairs.O Romeo, Romeo where fore art thou Romeo? Deny thy father and refuse thy name; or, if thou wilt not, be sworn my love, and Ill no longer be a Capulet. This is said Romeo by Juliet act 2 scene 2. This is sort of love and despair in the case that she is despairing because she loves Romeo but he is forbidden, and love because she loves him so much that she would refuse her name and take his which would mean abandon her own family.I think that passion differs very much from love in a way that it is almost lust e.g. o trespass sweetly urgd! Give me my sin again This is said by Romeo to Juliet in act 1 scene 5. This is when she kisses him and he is asking for more, but it is a sin because she is not wed to him and she is supposed to be pure for her husband.I think that it is not only love that tells the story but passion too.This was thought of Romeos first love, for he thinks that he is in love with rosaline who should be married to him, organised by her father, even though he has never met or seen her. Show me a mistress that is passing fair: what doth beauty serve but as a note thou canst not teach me to forgetThis is said to Benvolio, Romeos cousin by Romeo about rosaline in act 1 scene 1.Romeo is in love with the idea of love and is so rapped up in the spirit of his love that until he meets Juliet he mistakes excitement for love.Violence seems to me of more of an action rather than an emotion but it is a grate feeling in this play e.g. now by stock and honour of my kin, to strike him dead I hold it not a sinTybalt says this to all montages in act 1 scene5. I said that I thought violence more of an action than an emotion, but you can clearly see here that Tybalt is feeling violence and although he doesnt kill Mercutio until later in the play I think that he really does want to kill all montages for the sake of honour in this family feud. Also I think that Tybalt doesnt consider it a sin to kill all Montagues for he is in the right and they do not deserve the right to live in his eyes.In conclusion I feel that all the emotions contribute to this masterpiece although critics have said the story is a love and hate storyline all the other emotions bring it together.William Shakespeare has included the most intense and intimate emotions and used them to there full extent.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)